site stats

Hartzler v. city of san jose

WebDec 5, 2024 · After low-income households and housing advocates sued, a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge agreed with San Jose. 6 The Sixth District Court of Appeal reversed that decision, holding that "while a city's process for disposing of surplus city-owned land is typically a municipal affair, San Jose's policy here must yield to the state … WebSteven and April Gonzales appeal a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of City of San Diego's (City) demurrer without leave to amend to their second amended complaint for the wrongful drowning death of their mother.

Hartzler v. City of San Jose California Court of Appeal 02-18 …

WebDefendants are alleged to have (1) acted in an affirmative fashion which placed plaintiffs in peril or increased their risk of harm; (2) omitted or failed to act after a promise was made; and (3) created a special relationship upon which plaintiffs relied to their detriment. WebSee, for example, Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) 46 Cal. App. 3d 6 [120 Cal. Rptr. 5] (no liability for police delay in responding to call for assistance); Antique Arts Corp. v. City of Torrance (1974) 39 Cal. App. 3d 588 [114 Cal. Rptr. 332] (no liability for negligence by dispatcher for delay in broadcasting report of burglary); and ... gmc purchases https://josephpurdie.com

CITY OF SANTEE v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (1989) FindLaw

WebHARTZLER v. CITY OF SAN JOSE. [†] Retired judge of the superior court sitting under assignment by the Chairman of the Judicial Council. This is an appeal from a … WebHartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) , 46 Cal.App.3d 6 [Civ. No. 34650. Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District, Division Four. February 18, 1975.] JOHN E. … WebAt oral argument, plaintiffs' counsel pursued his contention that the police defendants affirmatively increased the peril to which the victims were exposed (i.e., a misfeasance … bolt taxi customer service number uk

Hartzler v. City of San Jose, 46 Cal.App.3d 6 Casetext …

Category:Zepeda v. City of Los Angeles - The Legal Guardian

Tags:Hartzler v. city of san jose

Hartzler v. city of san jose

SOUZA v. CITY OF ANTIOCH (1997) FindLaw

WebCity of San Jose, supra; cf. Leake v. Cain, supra. Because the officers here did not indicate that they would assist or protect plaintiff beyond calling a tow truck for her, because she … WebThe accident occurred during the early morning darkness on December 11, 1984, at an intersection in the City of Santee. Fleming's complaint, filed against Santee and Southwest, alleged the accident occurred primarily because the intersection was improperly lighted, due to a nonfunctioning street light above the intersection.

Hartzler v. city of san jose

Did you know?

WebDoctor Address. 4502 Medical Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229. (210) 358-4000. Affiliated Hospitals. 1. South Texas Veterans Health Care System-San Antonio. 2. University Health-San Antonio. Web( Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1976) 46 Cal.App.3d 6, 10 [ 120 Cal.Rptr. 5]; Mann v. State of California (1977) 70 Cal.App.3d 773, 780, fn. 6 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 82].) City's …

WebArizona, misdemeanor, nazi, nazies, Norton v Shelby, Right to keep and bear arms, Ron White, Sandy Hook, Section 241 & 242 of Title 18, self defense, shall not infringe, Statist, Supreme Court, Susman v. City of Los Angeles, The Color of Crime, Thomas Jefferson, To Protect & Serve, veterans, Virginia Tech, Warren v. District of Columbia, Werner ... WebFeb 18, 1975 · Research the case of Hartzler v. City of San Jose, from the California Court of Appeal, 02-18-1975. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that …

WebThis logical sequence of inquiry was overlooked in dicta in at least three Court of Appeal cases: Hartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) 46 Cal.App.3d 6, 120 Cal.Rptr. 5; Antique … WebFeb 18, 1975 · Research the case of Hartzler v. City of San Jose, from the California Court of Appeal, 02-18-1975. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data.

WebHARTZLER v. CITY OF SAN JOSE Email Print Comments (0) Docket No. 34650. View Case; Cited Cases; Citing Case ; Citing Cases . Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. ... 130 Cal.App.3d 882 - GONZALES v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. 32 Cal.3d 197 - DAVIDSON v.

bolt taxify customer careWebMay 28, 1991 · Focusing on the City's failure to warn him about Jenkins's attempt to arrange a contract to kill him, the gist of appellant's complaint was that as a witness in a felony prosecution he had a special relationship with the City, through its police department, such that it owed him a duty of care which required it to warn him about Jenkins's threat … gmc radio not workingWebAt approximately 2 p.m. on June 18, 1978, the decedent arrived at Black's Beach and, in the absence of posted warnings of the dangerous riptide and any police or lifeguard patrols, assumed the area was safe for public swimming, entered the surf, and drowned, her death being proximately caused by City's negligence in creating a dangerous and … bolt taxify customer serviceWebOpinion for Hartzler v. City of San Jose, 46 Cal. App. 3d 6, 120 Cal. Rptr. 5 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. ... v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 34650. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. February 18, 1975. *7 ... bolt taxify contact details gautengWebHartzler v. City of San Jose (1975) , 46 Cal.App.3d 6 [Civ. No. 34650. Court of Appeals of California, First Appellate District, Division Four. February 18, 1975.] JOHN E. HARTZLER, as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant and Respondent (Opinion by The Court.) [46 Cal.App.3d 7] COUNSEL gmc radio wont turn offWebJohn E. HARTZLER, as Administrator of the Estate of Ruth L. Bunnell, Deceased, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, Defendant and Respondent. Civ. … bolt taxi for businessWebIn the case at bar, plaintiffs admit that defendant therapists notified the police, but argue on appeal that the therapists failed to exercise reasonable care to protect Tatiana in that they did not confine Poddar and did not warn Tatiana or others likely to apprise her of the danger. Defendant therapists, however, are public employees. bolt taxify east london contact details